NILA’s impact litigation in the federal courts seeks procedural or substantive change either to extend the rights of noncitizens or to eliminate systemic obstacles they or their immigration counsel routinely face. It includes affirmative suits in district court as well as select circuit level litigation that has the potential to establish the law for a region of the country; and amicus briefing to assist federal court judges in their consideration of key legal issues.
NILA’s Affirmative Litigation Docket
Campbell Davis v. USCIS (E.D. Pa.) – Putative regional class action seeking immediate naturalizations for individuals who had their oath ceremonies cancelled or not scheduled due to the outbreak of COVID-19.
Co-Counsel: Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, Law Office of Stacy Tolchin, and Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP
Current Status: Notice of dismissal filed on July 28, 2020 after USCIS naturalized the named Plaintiffs and 2,202 members of the proposed class.
Nightingale v. USCIS (N.D. Cal.) – Certified national class action seeking to force USCIS and ICE to timely comply with requests for immigration case files (A Files) under the Freedom of Information Act.
Co-Counsel: Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, American Immigration Council, Law Office of Stacy Tolchin
Current Status: Discovery ongoing.
Padilla v. ICE (W.D. Wash.) – Certified national class action preserving the right to a bond hearing for asylum seekers who entered without inspection and passed a credible fear, seeking further procedural protections in those proceedings, and challenging delays in providing credible fear interviews.
Co-Counsel: Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, American Immigration Council, American Civil Liberties Union
Current Status: On August 23, 2020, the government filed a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision affirming the district court’s preliminary injunction order providing for bond hearings for members of the bond hearing class. Motions on the credible fear hearing class are currently held in abeyance.
Make the Road New York v. McAleenan (D.D.C) – Challenging the expansion of expedited removal.
Co-Counsel: American Civil Liberties Union, American Immigration Council, Simpson Thatcher & Bartlett LLC
Current Status: On June 23, 2020, the DC Circuit reversed the district court’s decision enjoining the expansion and remanded the case for consideration of additional claims not previously reached by the district court. On September 22, 2020, the Court declined to rehear the case. Proceedings in district court are ongoing.
Doe v. Nielsen (D. Ariz.) – Successful challenge to unconstitutional conditions in CBP’s short-term detention facilities (known as “hieleras”)
Co-Counsel: Morrison & Foerster LLP, American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, National Immigration Law Center, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, American Immigration Council
Current Status: Court is set to issue a final injunction against CBP.
C.M. v. United States – Action under the Federal Tort Claims Act seeking damages on behalf of five families subjected to the Trump Administration’s family separation policy
Co-Counsel: Arnold & Porter LLP, National Immigration Justice Center, American Immigration Council, Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin
Current Status: The court denied the United States’ motion to dismiss in March 2020. Discovery is ongoing.
Moreno v. Nielsen (E.D.N.Y.) – Putative class action challenging USCIS’ policy of denying adjustment applications filed by TPS holders who initially entered without inspection.
Co-Counsel: Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, American Immigration Council
Current Status: The parties completed briefing on Plaintiffs’ motions for class certification and for summary judgment and for Defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment on July 20, 2018. They completed briefing on Plaintiffs’ first motion for a preliminary injunction on November 18, 2018. The court has not yet set a hearing or ruled.
NILA authors amicus briefs on issues within the expertise of their staff. Likewise, NILA signs onto select amicus briefs written by outside authors on issues important to the immigrants’ rights movement. To request amicus support from NILA or to ask NILA to sign onto an amicus brief, please email Trina Realmuto (email@example.com) and/or Mary Kenney (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Select Circuit Court Litigation (Petitions for Review)
NILA attorneys also represent individuals who are pro se (not represented by counsel) on a pro bono basis. NILA attorneys accept appointments as counsel for pro se individuals pursuing petitions for review before the courts of appeals. NILA attorneys will only consider direct representation on a petition for review where the individual cannot afford counsel.
National Immigration Litigation Alliance, Inc.
Tel: (617) 819-4649